Feb 15, 2026
Key takeaways
Overview
“Polycythemia” describes increased red-cell mass, most commonly detected as elevated hemoglobin/hematocrit on a complete blood count. It may be:
Polycythemia vera (PV) is a BCR-ABL1–negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal erythrocytosis, frequently with leukocytosis and/or thrombocytosis, and is most often associated with JAK2 mutations. Modern diagnostic frameworks integrate blood counts, molecular testing, serum EPO, and bone marrow morphology (when indicated) to confirm PV and distinguish it from other causes of erythrocytosis. [1,3,4]
PV and secondary/relative erythrocytosis can look similar on CBC, but they differ in risk, evaluation, and management:
Polycythemia (umbrella term):
Polycythemia vera (PV):
Practical bottom line: use terminology + stepwise testing to move from “polycythemia” (a finding) to a specific diagnosis (PV vs secondary/relative cause). [2,3,4]
Common contributors include:
PV remains the key primary (clonal) cause to rule in/out when erythrocytosis is persistent and the pattern suggests marrow-driven disease.[1,2,3,4]
1. Confirm persistence
Repeat CBC to confirm sustained elevation, ideally after addressing potential hemoconcentration. [2]
2. Screen for common secondary drivers
History (altitude, smoking/CO exposure), medication review, and oxygen assessment when indicated. [2]
3. First-line differentiators
Serum EPO: low EPO supports a primary marrow process; normal/high EPO supports secondary causes. [2,3]
JAK2 testing: JAK2 mutation status is central to PV classification frameworks and strongly supports PV in the appropriate clinical/lab context. [1,3,4]
4. Second-line / selected cases
Bone marrow assessment may help resolve borderline/“masked” presentations under ICC/WHO-aligned frameworks. [1,3,4]
Final thoughts
“Polycythemia” is a finding, while polycythemia vera is a specific clonal disease with a distinct thrombotic risk profile. A stepwise evaluation using CBC confirmation, secondary-cause assessment, serum EPO, and JAK2 testing (± marrow assessment in selected cases) helps ensure the right diagnosis—and the right management pathway. [1,2,3,4]
There isn’t one single test that reliably distinguishes all cases. The most informative first-line combination is JAK2 mutation testing plus a serum erythropoietin (EPO) level: a JAK2-positive result with a low EPO strongly supports PV, while a normal/high EPO makes secondary causes more likely and guides the next evaluation steps. [1,2]
Often the first step is to repeat the CBC to confirm a persistent elevation and to review potentially reversible contributors (e.g., hemoconcentration, hypoxia/exposure history, medication causes). Prompt hematology review is generally appropriate when elevation persists and there are supportive features such as low EPO, JAK2 positivity, splenomegaly, or PV-suggestive symptoms (e.g., aquagenic pruritus). [1,2]
If the erythrocytosis is secondary to a reversible driver (e.g., hypoxia-related conditions, medication/exposure-related causes, or certain EPO-producing tumors), correcting the cause can lead to normalization of hemoglobin/hematocrit without PV-style long-term hematologic management. [2]
A negative JAK2 result makes PV less likely and raises the possibility of secondary causes or JAK2-unmutated (non-PV) erythrocytosis (acquired or hereditary). Next steps commonly include reassessing secondary drivers, using serum EPO to guide the pathway, and considering specialist evaluation for additional testing (including selected marrow/genetic workup when indicated). [8,9]
PV — Polycythemia vera
JAK2 — Janus kinase 2
CBC — Complete blood count
EPO — Erythropoietin
BCR-ABL1 — BCR–ABL1 fusion gene
CO — Carbon monoxide
ICC — International Consensus Classification
WHO — World Health Organization
FAQs — Frequently asked questions
Term of Use
The information on this site is provided for general informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. It should not be relied upon instead of guidance from your doctor or other qualified healthcare professional. The content on this website is not intended to be complete or exhaustive.
Always consult your doctor regarding any questions you may have about a medical condition or its treatment, and never ignore professional medical advice or delay seeking it because of something you have read on this website. For further information or advice, please speak with your doctor.